User Tools

Site Tools


0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship [2025/01/22 22:16] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.10_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship [2025/01/22 22:16] (current) – ↷ Page moved from 0_public:sanctions:ship to 0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship pointnm
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== SHIP ======
 +
 +In early November, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly backed the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum (Ship) bill, which targets foreign ports, refineries and vessels handling Iranian oil. 
 +
 +If passed into law, the Ship bill would impose sanctions on foreign ports that knowingly accept shipments of Iranian petroleum products, and on refineries that knowingly process petroleum originating from Iran. 
 +
 +It would also sanction vessels that transport or offload Iran-origin petroleum, including by ship-to-ship transfer. 
 +
 +The UK government had changed laws a month earlier allowing it to designate ships by IMO number for the first time. This was the only Sovcomflot tanker targeted.((https://archive.ph/ImtKD#selection-1389.0-1389.161)) ((2024))
 +
 +Jeremy Domballe, an expert at S&P Global Market Intelligence, suggested sanctioning ships could have stronger effects in stopping their operations than sanctioning shipowners, who can transfer ownership of tankers to non-sanctioned firms.
 +
 +