0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| 0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship [2025/01/22 22:16] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | 0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship [2025/01/22 22:16] (current) – ↷ Page moved from 0_public:sanctions:ship to 0_public:regulations_and_compliance:sanctions:ship pointnm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== SHIP ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In early November, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly backed the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum (Ship) bill, which targets foreign ports, refineries and vessels handling Iranian oil. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If passed into law, the Ship bill would impose sanctions on foreign ports that knowingly accept shipments of Iranian petroleum products, and on refineries that knowingly process petroleum originating from Iran. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would also sanction vessels that transport or offload Iran-origin petroleum, including by ship-to-ship transfer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The UK government had changed laws a month earlier allowing it to designate ships by IMO number for the first time. This was the only Sovcomflot tanker targeted.((https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jeremy Domballe, an expert at S&P Global Market Intelligence, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||